Overloading the Senses: "The Piano Tuner" by Daniel Mason
I have only written one negative critical review since I started this blog in 2006. The other one is about Norman Mailer's "The Deer Park," and it is about to get a "re-review" based on the insight I have gained from the book I am presently reading, "The Spooky Art." In it, Mailer explains difficulties about the work I was completely unaware of when I read and wrote the review. The difficulties dealt with the publishing world and its demands (plus Mailer's own problems with editing and addiction), and I am sure that Mason's book probably encountered some of the same obstacles. I'm not saying Mailer's book wasn't bad, but "The Deer Park" really does deserve a reevaluation based on what I've read. Unless I come across some details about "The Piano Tuner" that will help me change my mind about the book, I suspect this review will stand as is. I will keep it as short as possible.
What strikes the reader first about the style of the book is the obvious and overwhelming overuse of language designed to stimulate the senses. When done correctly, this can be a treat to the reader, but in the case of this book, it began to wear down the senses almost as soon as it began. The bold is mine for emphasis.
"In the fleeting seconds of final memory, the image that will become Burma is the sun and a woman's parasol. He has wondered which visions would remain--the Salween's coursing coffee flow after a storm, the predawn palisades of fishing nets, the glow of ground turmeric, the weep of jungle vines. For months the images trembled in the back of his eyes, at times flaming and fading away like candles, at times fighting to be seen, thrust forward like the goods of jostling bazaar merchants. Or at times simply passing, blurred freight wagons in a traveling circus, each one a story that challenged credibility; not for any fault of plot, but because Nature could not permit such a condensation of color without theft and vacuum in the remaining parts of the world.
Yet above these visions, the sun rises searing, pouring over them like a gleaming white paint. The Bedin-saya, who interpret dreams in shaded, scented corners of the markets, told him a tale that the sun that rose in Burma was different from the sun that rose in the rest of the world. He only needed to look at the sky to know this. To see how it washed the roads, filling the cracks and shadows, destroying perspective and texture. To see how it burned, flickered, flamed, the edge of the horizon like a daguerreotype on fire, overexposed and edges curving. How it turned liquid the sky; the banyan trees, the thick air, his breath, throat, and his blood. How the mirages invaded from distant roads to twist his hands. How his skin peeled and cracked."
The plot consists of a piano tuner contracted by the British Army to travel to Burma and tune the piano of an eccentric British army surgeon. The time period is 1886, but the observations and reactions of the protagonist ring false based on his political and personal opinions. He is well fleshed out, but his overly-liberal views on politics and culture make him flat and unrealistic. He belongs to the middle class in Victorian England, a man of modest means with a wife and a small piano tuning practice. His outrage and indignation at the imperial ambitions of England at that time ring false. I am sure there were exceptions to the rule, but historically one would tie this type of worldview to the intelligentsia (ironically the same class that depended the most on England's conquests), and not to the proud "common" man in service of Her Majesty the Queen.
The journey to Burma is far too long in terms of narrative length. During the journey, the reader is introduced to "The Man with One Story," a story-within-the story that falls victim to being overly eccentric. A man stands on the deck of the ship for many, many trips. He is blind and supposedly, once approached by the other passengers for a common greeting (good evening, good morning, or anything of the sort), he launches into a story that he tells exactly the same way (word by word) again and again. The use of ultra-sensory language and mirage-visions, etc. appears pointless and overdone. I suspect that the mesmerizing, blurry, dream-like narrative of "The Man with One Story" has something to do with the ending of the novel and how the protagonist "sees" his own demise, but I lack as a reader when it comes to this type of "do-it-yourself" connections.
It was difficult to understand the perspective about the "mission" the protagonist had been assigned because most of the "mission" was cryptic even to himself. I suspect this was another element of the style that was designed to make the reader turn the page. The army surgeon becomes an enigma from the very start, and, because of this, he turns into a "pest" throughout the narrative. The mystery factor about the doctor, and the protagonist's inquiry and curiosity only leads to disappointment once the good doctor is introduced. The build up did not satisfactorily reach the climax and the protagonist's mix of frustration and admiration about the enigmatic doctor doesn't make up for it. The reader never really fully understands the motivation of the plot until... wait, the doctor was a spy, a traitor, his concubine nothing more than a seducer working for the Russians, and don't you know... the book ends in a dream-like stupor of exhaustion and sensory overload.
It's not hard to criticize a book, really, but if one has a heart and knows of the difficulties behind this type of work (fiction writing) the criticism most likely will leave a bad taste in one's critical mouth. Like I said before, the "ins and outs" of the publishing world can be demanding to the point of absolute frustration. Part of me wants to believe the integrity of the creative process, but this book also shines a light on the market demands of the literary business. It feels as if an editor might have recognized the overuse of the sensory in the style of the book, but went ahead with it because "how could something so exotic as a sensory tour de force Victorian era trip to Burma not sell" to a particular demographic deeply embedded in the book club world? It's hard not to be a cynic when so much money is involved in this process. But still, I always feel like the onus is on me... I missed something... I failed to see the connection, the artistry and the real meaning of it all.
"The Piano Tuner" was disappointing in many ways. My main criticism for this book was the endless waves of literary sensory overload. I think the book has many merits in terms of plot, if you can overlook the constant inclination to compare the narrative to "Heart of Darkness" and the film "The Piano."